🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.